On August 26, 2009, the Port Klang Authority (PKA) sued Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) for wrongful or excess claims amounting to RM1.4 billion. This amount include
- excess interest calculations of RM720 million,
- wrongful claims for RM255 million for monsoon drain works and water supply works,
- excess claims of RM93 million for Office Blocks and Light Industries Units, and
- RM83 million for electricity supply and other works which have yet to be carried out
KDSB in turn has borrowed RM3.685 billion by issuing bonds to both local and international investors.
It was then arranged that since PKA will owe the contract fees to KDSB and KDSB owes money to its bondholders, PKA will make payments directly to KDSB's bondholders, on behalf of KDSB.
However, since the Government via PKA is clearly disputing a huge amount of RM1.4 billion payable to KDSB, PKA should not be making further payments to KDSB and by the above arrangement, to its bondholders until the disputed amount is resolved.
This is because should the Courts decide that KDSB has made wrongful or excess claims amounting to RM1.4 billion, the outstanding loans due to the bondholders must be settled by the owners of KDSB themselves (since they borrowed the money) and not by the Malaysian Government.
However, both the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak and the Deputy Finance Minister, Dr Awang Adek have confirmed that “the government would guarantee around US$1 billion [RM3.685 billion] in bonds issued [to KDSB] to fund a free zone project to allay investor concerns over the debt,” reported by Reuters yesterday. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had told an investor briefing in New York yesterday that the government would honour all PKFZ obligations.
The Prime Minister's guarantee hence tantamounts to an official bailout of KDSB who may be unable to repay the bondholders, if PKA is successful in its suit against KDSB. What is happening is that the Government on the one hand, believes that KDSB should not be paid RM1.4 billion for wrongful claims, while on the other hand, assures the bondholders that it will pay all debts owed by KDSB to its creditors.
The rakyat will want to ask why is the Government giving an iron-clad assurance to settle KDSB's debt obligations, even if the KDSB is subsequently proven to have failed to perform a satisfactory job on PKFZ and should not be paid in full? This only goes to show that at best the Government is completely clueless about its actions, or worse, it is sanctioning a bailout of KDSB which is owned by the Barisan Nasional Backbencher Club's Chairman, Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing.
We call upon the Government to pay only for services and works which has been satisfactorily completed and not a cent more for wrongful claims. Any outstanding debt to bondholders as a result of payment shortfalls by the Government must be settled by KDSB or its shareholders without involving a single cent of public funds.
7 comments:
tony,
stop complaining. thiscorrupt govt aint gonna change.
first thing first. think of innovative ways to raise extra funds for the states under PR control. want some suggestions? its gonna be controversial but its time to look at BN eyeball to eyeball. if your answer is yes, I will email you some suggestions but its gonna be unconventional.
My MP,
Something for you to bring up in the Parliament - Bukit Antarabangsa: Did Shaziman lie in parliament?
Tony....,
With so much of this & that slogan, you still think it works for the rakyat...???
PKFZ or "NOT", every single episode of their doing is always kautim...!!!
Rakyat has been ranting & raving & yet the system still go against us.
Chee Ke Ku Chee Kee mah...!!!
To Anonnymous at 11.15pm -since you said can't do anything,so the only thing we rakyat can do is be patience and wait for GE13 to come and take the right course of action!
This is what they call classic being a rock and a hard place. The govt should NOT have issued the guarantee in the first place. Since it has issued it, if it does not pay, its screwed. If it pays, its rewarding bad behaviour.
How do you fix it? It boils down to the terms of the bond that was issued and what the law says. Is the govt liable for the misconduct of the Minister of Transport? First and foremost, what does the law says and is it transparent? Should the security holders have known better and asked more questions of the legality of Ministry of Transport letter of support? If the letter is outside the powers given to the Ministry of Transport by law, then the govt is not liable and should not pay. Bondholders should have been more careful.
Anon 11.06,
Actually in this case, it's more than just the existing Govt guarantee on the bonds.
The point is, we can understand if KDSB does its work, the Govt then guarantees that PKA will make full payment as per agreement.
But the point I'm making in the above statement, is that even IF KDSB did not complete its work as required in the agreement, the Govt STILL has to pay the bondholders!
That's just ridiculous! (and not part of the letters of guarantee)
Tony
Dear YB Tony,
You are a good public watchdog (in a good sense).
Your sayings are well reported in the media which is good.
Please keep up the good work. And finally a thank you.
P130 voter
Post a Comment