Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Of Malay Rights and Golf Handicaps

Some would argue that former deputy Prime Minister, Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman was an architect of the much maligned New Economic Policy for Malaysia post 1969 racial riots. However, as I've quoted from the recently published book on Tun Dr Ismail by Dr Ooi Kee Beng, the former had possibly erred when he thought that "as more and more Malays became educated and gained self-confidence, they themselves would do away with this ‘special position’."

Underlining his beliefs that this "special position" will be removed in due course was when presenting his views on Malay special privileges, Ismail had a propensity to use a golf metaphor.
He told Philip Kuok that "this handicap will enable them to be good players, as in golf, and in time the handicap will be removed. The Malays must not think of these privileges as permanent: for then, they will not put their effort to the tasks. In fact it is an insult for Malays to be getting these privileges" (Kuok 1991, p.217).
Ismail used the same metaphor in his broadcast on 2nd August, Siaran Akhbar PEN. 8/69/22:
The special privilege or position accorded to the Malays under the Constitution is mainly intended to enable them - to borrow an expression from the game of golf - "to have a handicap" which would place them in a position for a fair competition with better players. Therefore, like a golfer, it should not be the aim of the Malays to perpetuate this handicap but to strive to improve their game, and thereby reducing, and finally removing, their handicap completely.
Now, those of us fortunate enough to know the game of golf, players who over-declare their handicaps to unfairly gain an advantage over the other players are known as "buayas", or worse, derided as dishonest cheats. Would Tun Dr Ismail be having the same view of those who have clearly achieved par golf competency but still insist on their "rights" to have an 18-handicap?

It should also be noted that Tun Dr Ismail never enshrined the Malay affirmative action as a "right", but instead the 'special position' granted was defined as a "privilege". Which UMNO or government leader today will have the necessary moral courage like Tun Dr Ismail to stand up and make a public proclaimation that it is an "insult for Malays" for getting these privileges?


Anonymous said...

He erred? Please!!!!! Its more likely historical revisionism...

UMNO ultras have lied and lied since May 13, 1969 and the honest moderates within have never had the courage to question them given the benefits the ultras have brought to the party.

When the NEP was formulated, it was set at 30 years clearly the parties all know full well that the thing HAD to end by law. But as the date got closer, Dr. M, a key revisionist, was in charge and the moderates became apologist with the exception of Tunku Abdul Rahman until his death bed...

Anonymous said...

Malaysia is even more racially divided now that before. Back in the 60s, every race mixed. Now every race is suspicious of each other. We have gone backwards, not forward thanks to the NEP.