The MCA Vice-President and former Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara (PJU), Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun has today, threatened to sue Yeo Bee Yin, state assemblywoman for Damansara Utama and/or Tony Pua, the current Member of Parliament for PJU.
The is with regards to remarks we have made about her position and role in a land grab scandal in Petaling Jaya between 2006 to 2008 which was discovered recently. This was a 1-acre piece of land which was awarded to MCA for RM1 per square feet or RM52,000 in total. A market price estimate of the land value based on approximately RM400 per square feet would add up to RM17.5 million.
We have established the following facts:
1. Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun was the Member of Parliament for PJU during the period concerned.
2. Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun is MCA Vice-President today. She was also the MCA Wanita deputy chairperson during the period concerned.
3. Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun is fully aware of the land application and transaction where the BN state government then granted the ownership of the land to MCA.
4. Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun is fully aware of the location of the land as she was at one point in time initiating or encouraging a dragonfruits farming project there.
5. The land was formerly occupied by squatters before they were evicted by the then BN state government.
6. The land deal has profited MCA immensely at the expense of the state government and the people of Selangor.
7. The land is currently zoned as a “water body” [“Badan Air (Sungai)] in the Petaling Jaya Local Plan (RTPJ) and MCA has applied to convert the “water body” into a “commercial and services” zone.
8. This is not the first land grab scandal in Selangor by MCA, but the first discovered in Petaling Jaya.
Therefore, we questioned:
1. What is the role played by Datin Paduka Chew, whether directly or indirectly to support the land grab?
2. Did Datin Paduka Chew object to or at any point of time attempted to stop the land application by MCA given that she was fully aware of the transaction? Or did she close one eye and placed the interest of MCA above that of her voters?
3. Does Datin Paduka Chew, as a very senior MCA party leader believe that the land grab by MCA is an ethical exercise and not a breach of trust of the people who have voted for her and her party then?
4. If Datin Paduka Chew still have any conscience left in her, would she agree with us that the land be returned to the state government so that it can remain as a “water body”, acting as a buffer to prevent flooding along Sg Kayu Ara in Kg Chempaka? Or at the very least, would she agree that it is only proper for a political party pay the full premium for the land which was alienated by the state government?
We find absolutely nothing defamatory in the above questions and facts, which were expressed in the purported defamatory video published by Yeo on her Facebook and our joint press conferences over the issue. Hence there is absolutely no reason for the video to be taken down.
Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun is free to sue Yeo and/or Pua as that is her prerogative. However, our genuine advice to the former Deputy Minister is, if she is concerned about her political reputation being damaged, she will be much better off winning the hearts and minds of the people by declaring that all parcels of land alienated by state governments all over the country to MCA be returned to the respective state governments, failing which the premium for the parcels of land be paid in full.
Tony Pua & Yeo Bee Yin
No comments:
Post a Comment