Thursday, July 12, 2012
The latest RM57 million “overpayment” alleged by Datuk Chua Tee Yong proves not only the fact that he doesn’t do his homework, he also cannot read and count
#1. Datuk Chua can’t read and count
MCA today accused the Selangor government of "overpaying" RM57.3 million to Talam Corporation Bhd for 53.74 hectares of land in Danau Putra, Selangor.
Datuk Chua had claimed that the land was over-valued, because it was 80 percent submerged under water. He asked “Why is the PR Selangor government buying land which is 80 per cent submerged underwater and requires more than RM50 million to fill up before they can commence development?”
Referring to the exact same document which Datuk Chua was using to demonstrate his knowledge during the press conference, the land valuation report by Chartwell ITAC International indeed highlighted the fact that “the cost of filling is estimated of about RM51,500,000”.
However, Datuk Chua seems to have failed to read in the same paragraph of the report (page 77 of the Talam Shareholders’ Circular dated 15 March 2012) that Chartwell has already “made further adjustment to our valuation by excluding the estimated cost of earth filling of the area under water”.
After deducting the above, Chartwell arrived at a professional valuation of RM93.5 million for the land which is even higher than the valuation of RM87.7 million given by state government. Hence Datuk Chua’s accusation that the state has failed to take into account of the submerged land and overpaid as a result, is another simple case of double-counting. Datuk was basically trying to deduct the cost of filling the land again, even after it has been taken into consideration by the professional valuer.
#2. Datuk Chua failed to do his homework again
Datuk Chua had asked "How come [one of the four parels of] land was auctioned off? And why was the aforesaid plot priced at 2.86 times the auction amount and, assuming the price was RM5.20psf, why did the Selangor government overpay by RM57 million?"
He further added that due to some legal complications, the land was auctioned off on Sept 7 that year. However, Chua admitted that he did not know state the nature of the legal action that led to the property being auctioned.
Datuk Chua has failed to secure information with regards to the legal “complication” above which might have protected him against making another wild unsubstantiated allegation against the Selangor state government.
A look at the publicly available January 2012 Talam Corporation Bhd Annual Report will immediately disclose the history of the legal complication. Bangkok Bank Bhd (BBB) had erroneously auctioned the above said property on 7 September 2010 despite being aware that the land is part and parcel of properties being disposed to Menteri Besar (Incorporated) (MBI) under a settlement agreement entered into on 12 March 2010.
Talam has taken legal action against the bank to recover the losses from the land, where the bank auction purchaser bought for RM15 million, well below the transacted value with MBI of RM48.7 million.
However, what proves to be a stroke of business savvy and negotiating genius of the Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim-led MBI was the fact that regardless of the outcome of the legal dispute, the interest of the state in collecting the outstanding debt is not at all compromised. Talam has disclosed in the Annual Report that “the disposal of this property will not have any significant impact on the MBI settlement agreement”. The Company stated that “if necessary, the Company will identify a piece of land to replace the abovementioned to MBI”.
(Page 124 in the Notes to Financial Statement of the 2012 Annual Report)
This proves that the State Government will not lose a single sen over the above transaction unlike what was alleged by Datuk Chua Tee Yong. It would perhaps have been more productive if he starts shifting his focus to how Talam was able to amass such a huge RM392 million debt with the state government, and perhaps he might be able to find some mud against BN then.
We have shown clearly with facts, figures and documents to prove that all the alleged scandals raised during Datuk Chua’s press conferences were completely without basis. Datuk Chua has proven to be an incompetent leader of the MCA Young Professionals Bureau, making mistakes after mistakes during press conferences. Datuk Chua should perhaps stop the attempts to dig a deeper hole for himself while attempting to cover up his RM1 billion mega-blunder.