The following is the Malaysian Insider report on the Pakatan Rakyat Convention yesterday with regards to the contentious issue of local government elections. Malaysiakini has also got Karpal Singh and Hannah Yeoh's comments.
DAP’s Hannah Yeoh (pic) emerged as the only speaker that critically debated the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) common policy framework, urging the coalition to restore local government elections.
“The local governments collect millions in tax revenue every year, but the public has no say in electing their members,” said Yeoh at the PR’s inaugural convention here.
“Local election will also improve the quality of local councillors, the best candidate will win,” she declared.
In the coalition’s common policy launched earlier today, it is stated that PR is committed to “strengthen local government democracy and democratically enhance the competency and effectiveness of the delivery system and guarantee transparency at all levels.”
Such a choice of words was made to appease PR leaders who are opposed to restoring local government elections. The Malaysian Insider understands that Malay leaders from both PAS and PKR are worried that local governments would be dominated by the non-Malays should councillors are elected openly.
“If local elections is restored, councillors will be more hardworking, thus improving efficiency in the local authorities,” said Yeoh.
She also urged PR leaders not to worry about the outcome of local elections.
“The Chinese and the Indians have voted for PAS, the people have moved away from their fears... We should not be fearful of the third vote,” she added.
Earlier, when opening the convention, DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng admitted that the party had to compromise on its commitment to restore local elections.
DAP has been known to be a staunch advocate for the restoration of the local council election while PAS are known to oppose it and PKR are internally frayed on the issue despite having promised to restore the local council vote in its 2008 General Elections manifesto.
Since the suspension of local government elections in the 1960s, councillors have been appointed directly by the state government and this has since been turned into a political reward for ruling party officials.
The restoration of local elections is one of the demands made by electoral reforms coalition Bersih, which also comprise PR parties.
In November 2007, the group organised the largest street demonstration in Kuala Lumpur in a decade, mobilising some 60,000 protesters to demand for free and fair elections.
The coalition’s effort in mobilising support contributed to Barisan Nasional’s worst electoral performance in Election 2008, which was held just four months later.
7 comments:
Gusto to Hannah! To all those leaders of PR, you have to remember what your election promises are. We bought into them and if you do not fulfill for whatever reason, THEN how different are you guys from the goons? Cakap-cakap aje?
1Malaysia for Local Election
The third vote should not be feared; the framework for running a PBT is well entrenched in the law. There is no way an elected rep can hide if there is wrongdoing.
If the rep does his job in the prescribed manner, why should we care (as ratepayers) what race he is from?
I don't know how accurate is Malaysia Insider information. How come race still matters? We are all Malaysians, aren't we? The most important thing is whether the candidate can do the job.
DAP should publish a report on which sections of the Federal legislation prevent state governments from holding local government elections. I think the people are confused because local government elections used to be held, and the current perception is that DAP and Pakatan simply don't want to hold local government elections now that they are in power. The report should also discuss the monopoly powers of the SPR in organising public elections in Malaysia. Come to think of it, I think Pakatan should have a law reform thinktank producing proposals on what laws that are going to be amended once they come into power.
If even the general election can be abused, and some idiots managed to win, how sure are we that local government election will be properly run?
at the end pr would say it's not state or PR against local council election but the federal ministry. everything that is reluctant to be executed will push to "federal" or bn, since when PR will really be sincere and initiative to keep to their promise and manifesto - first give people hope, and then semuanya lupa, semuanya cakap kosong sajalah. kpl case is another example too,.
"If even the general election can be abused, and some idiots managed to win, how sure are we that local government election will be properly run?"
the same too general election. because of BN being generous and democratic, they lost selangor and penang. maybe because PR observed how BN lost selangor and penang during AAB's helm, PR thinks it's better not to hold local election because they knew many people already fed up with them and their EMPTY promises....
Post a Comment