After the recent award of a RM6 billion contract to Boustead Naval Shipyard to build 6 offshore patrol vessels in early February, it was announced by DRB-Hicom Bhd on Bursa Malaysia yesterday that it has secured a RM7.55 billion contract from the Ministry of Defence to supply 257 units of 8x8 Armoured-Wheeled Vehicles (AWC) or Armoured Personnel Carriers (APCs).
The award which was made on 23 February is for Deftech Sdn Bhd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of DRB-Hicom Bhd to “design, develop, manufacture, commission, supply and delivery” of the vehicles over a 7-year period at an average price of RM29.4 million for each unit.
I had first raised this issue in April last year, when the letter of intent was first given to Deftech Sdn Bhd for a proposed RM8 billion purchase. I had then given several comparisons on the cost of APCs which have been acquired by other countries recently which are at substantially lower costs.
The Portugese Army bought 353 Pandur II 8x8 armoured vehicles for the amount of EUR364 million (RM1.56 billion) or only RM4.4 million each. The latest version of Piranha III 8x8 armoured-wheeled vehicle developed by the Swiss MOWAG GmBH cost only US$1.2 million, or RM3.9 million.
And in 2009, the U.S. Army has awarded a USD$2.2 billion contract to General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada, one of the best military vehicle and equipment manufacturer in the world, for 724 Light Armored Vehicles (LAV) or equivalent of US$3.04 million or only RM9.9 million each, meant for Saudi Arabia!
Further research has revealed that DRB-Hicom will be acquiring the AWC technology from Turkish company – FNSS Defence Systems Inc which manufactures the Pars 8x8 AWV models. With this deal, Malaysia will be its first foreign customer for this vehicle. What is perhaps of greater alarm is the fact that FNSS has announced that they have sold 257 units of Pars 8x8 AWVs to Malaysia for approximately US$600 million or RM1.83 billion or only RM7.1 million per unit.
As reported by Defense Update (http://defense-update.com), a well-regarded online defense magazine, “the cost of the new vehicle seems excessively high - about US$9.8 million per unit. Malaysian defence officials explained that these figures represent the total life cycle cost of the program, including which usually includes design, development, logistical support and sustainment as well as non-recurring engineering costs and investments associated with the set-up of local production facilities in Malaysia to develop its armoured vehicle manufacturing. Yet, even when considering a 250% mark-up to cover such the price tag on the new Malaysian vehicle seem odd.”
The Minister of Defence must explain the glaring gap between the cost of the AWC vehicles and the price to be paid by the Malaysian Government, especially since the award to Deftech was made without any open tenders, just like the RM6 billion award to Boustead Naval Shipyard.
The trends towards mega-military acquisitions without the accompanying transparency and accountability as demanded by the Prime Minister’s own Government Transformation Programme makes a mockery of the call for “reform”. The escalating defence spending is also a direct affront to the Government’s attempt to reign in the ballooning budget deficit, which has resulted in various attempts to curb spending by cutting subsidies for the man-on the street.
7 comments:
How else to raise financing for coming GE? These contracts have upfront payment to UMNO directly..
Turkish, Malaysian companies sign $600 mln defense industry deal
Published: 2/22/2011
Turkish defense industry company FNSS signed Tuesday a $600 million deal with Malaysia’s DEFTECH to sell armoured combat vehicles to Malaysian military.
Turkish Defense Minister Vecdi Gonul and his Malaysian counterpart Amhad Zahid Hamidi witnessed the signing of agreement in Ankara.
Under the $600 million deal for the sale of 257 armoured combat vehicles, the Pars 8x8, Turkish company FNSS will design, develop and produce vehicles and provide logistics support.
read:http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=364305
YB Tony,
I wonder why you are so interested and keen in Military procurement?.
LtCol Ong(Rtd)
Dear Mr Pua,
Aside from the common sense approach to the MRT feeder bus issue, I'd just like to congratulate you on your dogged pursuance of the facts while the remainder of the House seems unwilling or incapable of undertaking that most basic and crucial of duties as a Parliamentarian- to ask difficult questions!
And in a parliamentary system, the Defense Chiefs are subservient to the House, and not just doffing their hats and thrwing salutes to their political masters occupying the top floor of MinDef!
I, for one, am glad that at least one MP is trying to do his job in ensuring the country's coffers are being zealously guarded instead of joining in the continuous looting of it.
Keep up the good work!
Yours truly,
A Concerned Citizen
PS I also hope that this answers LTC (ret.) Ong's curiosity (or rather his perceived insinuation) about your interest in defense procurement.
Its blatant corruption and theft of tax-payers money, simple as that. Not much different from Muammar Gaddafi. If Islamic hudud law applied to the perpetrators and beneficiaries, what would be the punishment? It would certainly be justice done.
Is our country facing threat of invasion by our enemies or what,so much so that the defence ministry needs to go on a shopping spree(first the acquiring of 6 units of combat sea vessels @RM6.1 billion,then another RM7.5 billion to acquire 257 units of APC).
From what I analyse,the govt has the flwg motives:
1) to spin the economy to show that the country can achieve good growth.
2) as one of the channels to solicit political funds.
3) to lay as a financial burden for the next govt(if in case BN lost the next GE).
LtCol(R) Ong
Not only our MP but everyone because the money does not belongs to U but all taxpayers. It is OUR money. You work hard, get fired from the BOSS and even work OT foc. Maybe in Government Service it is senang and have perks. Therefore taxpayers have THE RIGHTS to DEMAND where our money goes. Ok if buy but are they BEST for money? If we bought a TANK for you but cannot move, are U happy? If U are a submariner and the submarine cannot SINK are U happy? OK if there is no war but if it fails to dive during war time?
Post a Comment